After the whole group met for the first time yesterday,
today the first official day of sessions for our 2013 HIA Fellowship in France.
Today’s sessions consisted of several short workshops, on: (1) encountering
privilege and oppression, (2) power and community organizing, and (3) owning (and
telling) your story. The day was a very emotional one, as many fellows shared
their stories and we began to connect on a much deeper level. I wanted to begin
by sharing my deepest thanks to everyone who shared a part of their story with
me today; it was so wonderful to get to know you all better, and I can’t wait
to continue that process and to begin to get to know some of the other fellows
with whom I did not get to speak as much today.
Our first session was a workshop titled “Reflecting on
privileges: understanding the other” run by Alison Knight. Allison’s passion is
confronting and dismantling privilege, and her research has had a particular
focus on the cradle-to-prison pipeline in the U.S. In this workshop, we began
by identifying the different aspects that may construct our identity (gender,
race, ethnicity, class/wealth, sexuality, religion, age, nationality), considered
on how we personally identify within each of these categories, and reflected
how we feel about each of these identities (which made us feel positive or
proud, which made us feel limited, etc.) Next, we moved into a discussion on
privilege, considering the difference between the “Traditional Difference
Framework” – which assumes that there is one “norm” and then 1+ variations from
this alleged ‘norm’ – and the “Integrative Privilege/Oppressive Framework”,
which proposes that we all experience different privileges and oppressions, and
thus are all both a part of the problem and a part of the solution. We considered how the first framework might result in systems
that claim to promote ‘colorblindness’ or ‘tolerance’, but do so at the cost of
ignoring or denying diversity. In contrast, Allison suggested that the second
framework may be more effective in recognizing the nuances and intersectionality inherent in the question
of privilege.
Moving outside into the courtyard, we participated in the
‘Privilege Walk Exercise.’ This activity is designed to make participants
consider how dynamics of privilege and identity may function within the group. This
experience was very impactful and eye opening for me, and I think many other
fellows felt the same; indeed, even though I had participated in this activity
before, doing so after our preparatory readings and our initial discussion with
Alison took the experience to a new level. Once we were finished, we reflected on
our personal experience of the exercise, first in a small group with those who
had ended the exercise near to us and later as a whole. We considered questions
such as: How did it feel to step forward, backwards, or stay in the same place?
How did it feel to end up towards the front of the courtyard, the back of the
courtyard, or in the middle? After this initial reflection, we considered how dynamics
of privilege and oppression may affect our conversations within the group, and how
we could each implement the new individual awareness that we had gained from
the ‘Privilege Walk Exercise.’ We talked about how we could use this awareness
in the short-term to be a more considerate classmate in the context of HIA and
in the long-term to be more effective in a career in social justice.
After we had finished this workshop, we went on to complete
two connected sessions with former director of HIA France, Tara Dickman. The
first workshop was titled, ‘The notion of Power in Community organizing’, while
the second, ‘Owning your story, defining your self-interests.’
We began by debating about the meaning of the word ‘power,’ and
questioned whether we personally were comfortable with asserting ‘I want
power’. We noted that in French, the word for the noun power, ‘pouvoir’,
literally means ‘to be able to do something.’ Tara therefore defined power as
the ‘ability to be able to act upon and impose your values.’ As such, she
argued, for community organizers having ‘power’ is a key goal. We discussed the
many ways that people can obtain power (money, networks, connections,
knowledge, privilege, strategy, coercion, bribery, guilt), and Tara suggested
that the most effective way to gain and retain power in the long-term is to
identify and pursue your ‘self-interest’ and proceed to ally your cause to the
‘self-interests’ of others. In this context, the word ‘self-interest’ was used
to describe your ultimate goal or passion.
After lunch, we progressed from this theoretical discussion
on power to the second part of the workshop, which focused on ‘owning your
story’. We discussed how stories can be central to community organizing, both
in the sense of being able to own and share your story and in the sense of
listening to others’ stories and aligning your cause to their self-interests.
As such, we learned that a key part of being an effective organizer is the
ability to self-reflect and effectively construct your story. Additionally, Tara told us that it is
essential to realize that people – and nations – fundamentally make sense, and
as such, if we don’t understand someone or don’t understand another culture, it
is probably because we aren’t thoroughly reflecting or because we are missing a
part of the their story.
Now having considered the importance of stories, we had time
to reflect and write our own personal story. I found it interesting to consider
the factors that have made me who I am and to try to understand the threads
that ‘connect the dots’ of my story. Afterwards, we shared these stories in
small groups, and some shared their story with all of us. It was incredible to
hear all of these stories and very much look forward to also learning about the
stories of others over the next few weeks.
Having determined the significance of stories and
participated in constructing our own story and listening to those of others, we
finished the workshop by discussing the tool of the ‘one-on-one’, an in-depth
interview focused on finding the self-interest of another person. Tara
demonstrated how to perform a one-on-one, and emphasized that two attitudes are
key to effectively employing this tool: courage and genuine curiosity. We
learned that the one-on-one might be used to help someone else clarify his or
her self-interest and/or clarify our own self-interest; what’s more, the interview
can also build the foundation towards moving forward to work on a project where
the self-interests of the two participants intersect.
As you can probably see, today was extremely busy, interesting, and
exciting first session for our HIA France Fellowship! I imagine that we will
continue to revisit and reconsider many of our discussions about privilege,
oppression, and power over the next few weeks, and I look forward to continuing
to learn more about each other’s stories and passions.
Kelsey Jost-Creegan (US Fellow)
Kelsey Jost-Creegan (US Fellow)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.